Subscribe by entering your e-mail:
| 10 Comments | Tweet |
|
Written by Jeremy Mims
It was a little more than three years ago now that Paul Graham wrote “Cities and Ambition”. It’s a wonderful read and mostly correct (except New York has changed quite a bit). It was right before I entered Y Combinator and my team was part of the last batch of startups that would ever graduate from the Cambridge YC HQ. By all logic, Boston should have been one of the epicenters of the new tech boom. But it wasn’t.
In 2005, I moved to Cambridge. It had everything a budding entrepreneur could want. I had smart roommates (PhDs at Harvard and M.I.T.), low rent near Central Square, and the Charles River to keep me company on my daily runs. But I actually knew nothing of the startup scene around me. In my little fishbowl in my first floor apartment, I had no idea what I was doing and I didn’t know what I should be looking for so I kept plugging away. In the Fall of 2005, there was a bright shining moment. Some folks I had never heard of called Y Combinator were throwing a Startup School Conference at Harvard nearby! I read about it on Wired.com, hopefully applied to attend, and was overjoyed when I was accepted. Many coincidences led to this moment, but I can pinpoint it as one of the most course changing of my life.
There were many future YC founders who attended and we all sat there listening to folks like Steve Wozniak, Chris Sacca, Stephen Wolfram, Paul Graham, and more tell us how to get moving on our dreams. And then we had a Q&A with the first batch of YC Founders. Alexis Ohanian has since told me that he thought his performance was particularly disappointing. He wasn’t and I was absolutely smitten with the idea that if it was possible for these guys, then I could do it too.
I’m actually sure that this event was the high watermark for what might have become of the Boston Tech Scene. Well, actually perhaps it was the next day. Wayne Chang (founder of i2hub and partner to the Winklevosses in ConnectU — which wasn’t vaporware BTW) organized a brunch at Top of the Hub Restaurant in Downtown Boston. It’s a beautiful, luxurious and unbelievably expensive way to eat breakfast at the top of the Prudential Tower. It was there that I met my future cofounder, sat next to Drew Houston before he had started working on Dropbox, and met many people at this brunch who have gone on to do amazing things. It would be fair to say that hundreds of millions of dollars in value were created by people in that room (and that’s if you exclude Drew… otherwise it would be billions). If a Boston VC had had the foresight to show up and throw $100,000 dollars at each person at the table, it would have changed the Boston entrepreneurial landscape forever. Drew alone would have made sure of that.
But the Boston VCs never showed up.
And this was true for YC as well. Boston VCs invested only once or twice in Y Combinator companies and after one (I believe) of the Y Combinator companies in the Summer of 2008 received investment from Boston, YC pulled up stakes, headed permanently to Mountain View, and absolutely nothing changed… except now almost all YC teams were now closer to where they were ultimately going to move to and get their funding from anyway.
While the signs of Boston’s irrelevance from the tech scene were unmistakeable, the true downfall of Boston as a tech hub began with the economic downturn in New York City. It’s been my home for the past five years and except for the fact that the tech scene used to be kind of lame, the rent is too damn high, and it lacks a direct equivalent to Stanford or M.I.T. (which looks like it might change by the way), it is a truly wonderful place to live. Banking has become less sexy and the newest millionaires and billionaires haven’t always made their fortunes from shuffling money from one place to another.
PG has always maintained that the timing and location of Silicon Valley was merely a coincidence. The guys that struck it rich from National Semiconductor started investing in new companies. And as new companies made their fortunes, those guys started investing too. It became a vortex for talent and the effect compounded on itself. I’ve always wished that it had happened coincidentally in NYC, but New York has seen the same sort of effect as of late. Ken and Ben Lerer made fortunes and set up their fund which invests quickly and aggressively, the founders of DoubleClick started an incubator which has spun out 10gen, Gilt Groupe, and Business Insider. Mike Brown from Aol Ventures is based here and has largely picked winners. The experience is here, the money is here, and did I mention it really is a wonderful place to live?
Of course this never could have happened if Boston’s complacency hadn’t let it. There are more than a dozen YC companies located in New York City now (pretty much all in the last year). More than ever stayed in Boston. All the investors had to do was show up.
I recently met with an old friend and investor in my previous YC company. He’s spent the last two years working for a prestigious VC Firm in Boston. They had a meeting a few months ago remarking on the fact that they were missing out on all these hot New York City startups and they wanted to know if anyone would be willing to relocate to capture some of that deal flow. No one raised their hand but him. I didn’t mention it, but I couldn’t help but think that it’s not so hard to set up a new office. We’re watching a shift of power and we’ll likely watch the money and the offices move. Sure, some won’t make the trip from Rome to Constantinople, but the change is real and palpable.
So, what is wrong with Boston VCs? They’re timid for sure, but the ingredients for a successful tech community haven’t changed. And Boston still has them in spades. They have money, tech schools, previously successful entrepreneurs, lower rent than San Francisco and New York, a pretty decent mass transit system… It’s just that damn timidity. Maybe they need to forget those gorgeous offices in Waltham and Downtown Boston. Maybe they need to go set themselves up in Central Square. Or, maybe when they set up offices in New York City things will finally change.
What do you think?
Update: I incorrectly stated a belief that no startups from the S08 Y Combinator batch received funding from a Boston VC. Alan from Cloudant has reminded me that their team actually did (although the Avalon Ventures website lists their primary office in California). The article has been updated to reflect this fact but I believe the major point still stands. The majority of the YCS08 class took funding from Silicon Valley as have the majority of YC companies in all rounds.
You should follow us on twitter here.
Hey Jeremy-
I started to write a response and then realized it was too long and would need to be its own post. But I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that 1) At least one company, Cloudant, from YCS08 got funding from a Boston VC (Hi!) and 2) YC pulled up stakes and left Boston for good less because of the Boston VCs and more for personal reasons for PG/JL.
Alan, you’re right. I actually didn’t know that. I’ve corrected the article. Hope you guys are doing awesome.
Jeremy, good post. You are right, investors in Boston missed the boat, and often still do so. The big gap I think isn’t just timidity broadly. It’s timidity at the seed stage for Internet enabled businesses. There is a dearth of investors with relevant experience in this space and an investment model and strategy that fits for true early stage companies. But it’s getting better. There are a few more investors that fit (I hope we are one of them) and more entrepreneurial role models that are making investments and contributing their human capital to founders building businesses in this sector.
By the way, feel free to stop by our offices any time or email me at rob at nextviewventures do com
Thanks for responding Rob. A piece of my heart remains with the Boston community and I remain hopeful that it will get in the game. It seems you guys are investing in some very promising companies.
In NYC, if you’re an entrepreneur who is not making money yet AND you’re not in the middle of a tech trend (like now) then you’re pretty low on the social hierarchy. If you’re talented you could quickly move up that hierarchy in no time by simply working in something more conventional (immediately more money, status, etc).
In the Bay Area, even during crappy times there are a lot of people who have respect for creativity and people who make new stuff. Honestly, I don’t see that as ever being the case in NYC or too many other places (exceptions being Seattle, Austin, Colorado, some university towns).
So let’s cut to the chase – in a downtime as an entrepreneur/techie you’re going to have a hard time getting a date in NYCa. That matters because over time smart engineers/entrepreneurs aren’t going to flock to a place where they find only fairweather friends.
Hi Jay,
After living in New York for five years, I’ve got to say that I can’t really confirm the social hierarchy/getting a date thing. This city is so full of energy and potential that people are always on the lookout for it. It’s filled with lots of people who haven’t made a dime yet in school, the arts, humanities, social work, regular jobs, and even down on their luck bankers. The truth is that unless you’re looking to cut the line at clubs, order bottle service regularly, or want a board seat at the Metropolitan Opera, no one really cares.
In Boston, you are really in a Huge college town. In SF, you are in a fast paced & beautiful town. Where you want to get business done? In the college town? It is hard. The pace is too slow!
Hi Jeremy, as your former roommate from those days in Central Square, I recall you as one of the few people I knew who had the passion be a founder. Do you think that Boston has the critical mass of founders who are courageous enough to put themselves out there? Clearly, it is the VC’s job to find the great startups around them and to answer the requests of those who reach out to them, but I see the diversity of investors in the valley as part of the magic that allows so many great companies to be funded there. Investment (like so many things) is a two-side network and without a sufficient pool of tech founders, web related VCs are not focused on Boston market.
With the fantastic research and ingenuity of Boston/Cambridge academia comes a safety net that pushes some would-be founders back to the retreats of a nice salary and low-risks/low-rewards of schools.
I have to say that this post is bit backward looking and misses tremendous progress over the last few years in Boston.
While Boston could certainly do better, there is a a vibrant start-up community with active early stage VCs (Founders Collective, Launch, Spark, Project 11), traditional stodgy VCs (Matrix, Atlas…) making seed investments. The glacial paced Common Angels has setup a quick seed investment fund. TechStars Boston was wildly over subscribed with investors this year. Mass Challenge has 150 finalists.
New York is doing great, SF is a mobile social gaming start-up meca and believe it or not, Boston is making great strides.
I’m not rooting against Boston as a tech hub. I want them to embrace all the advantages they have and succeed. I’m glad to hear in some ways they are.